The Nature and Extent of Delinquency

Measuring delinquency

Official data

crimes reported to the police

the FBI's UCR

Self-report data

anonymous surveys of adolescents

"secret or hidden delinquents"

Victim data

victim surveys

National Crime Victimization Survey

Official Statistics

FBI and the UCR

crimes known to the police

arrests made

persons arrested

Sources for online data

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

http://ojjdp.ncjrs.org/ojstatbb/index.html

FBI

http://www.fbi.org

FBI and the UCR

Part I or index crimes

homicide and non-negligent manslaughter

forcible rape

robbery

aggravated assault

burglary

larceny

arson

motor vehicle theft

UCR Data

UCR expresses data in three ways

the number of crimes reported to the police given as raw figures

percent changes between years computed

crime rates per 100,000 population reported

Hate Crimes Statistics Act

Congress passed in 1990
Crimes motivated by religious, ethnic, racial, or sexual-orientation bias will be counted differently than they have been in the past

Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act

1990 passed by Congress
Colleges and universities keep crime data and report it to the UCR program

Juvenile Court Statistics

Describes the number and characteristics of delinquency and status offense cases disposed of by the juvenile court
Provides a snapshot of juvenile court activity in a given year

Criticisms of UCR

information on serious crimes, like many white-collar or corporate crimes not included
reflects police biases and behavior, not crime
reflect citizen willingness to call the police
data collected involuntarily
variations in reported data may not mean that criminal behavior has changed

NIBRS

National Incident-Based Recording System
Collects more information about each criminal act than the UCR
date, time,and location of crime
offender characteristics of age, sex, race, ethnicity
offense characteristics of alcohol, drugs, weapon or force

Victimization Surveys

Hidden delinquency
NORC (National Opinion Research Center)
NCVS (National Crime Victimization Survey) by U. S. Bureau of Justice Statistics
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict.htm
1989, included more questions about sexual victimizations

Self Report

Subjects asked
report the number of times they engaged in a given act during a particular period
Uncover information on hidden delinquency
Supplement police, court, and victimization data

Short and Nye’s study

no detectable relationship between social class and delinquency

Cernkovich, Giordano, and Pugh

self-reports provide a gauge of delinquency, but only for less serious occasional offenders

Problems of Self-Report

samples may not accurately represent the number of delinquents
disagreement on the offense categories included
memory and distortion problems

Delinquency

Prevalence of delinquency

number of juveniles involved

Incidence

how many delinquent acts are committed

Juvenile Trends

In 1997, 26% of the U.S. population was 17 years old or younger and 18 percent of all persons arrested were in this age group.

Since 1993, the number of violent crimes reported to police has declined by 15 percent.

Official Statistics

Measuring official delinquency

disaggregated arrest statistics

total number of arrests does not equal number of people who have been arrested

Measuring is difficult

no one measurement system contains data on offenses, offenders, and victims.

Correlates of delinquency

Gender and delinquency

males more delinquent than females

girls more likely to be arrested for running away

Ruben Gur, explains that the brains of females and males are different in regulating emotional processing.

Since 1960, the gender ratio for Index offenses has steadily declined (14:1 to 5:1).

Racial and ethnic patterns in delinquency

In 1997, 80 percent of the juvenile population was white.

Racial minorities disproportionately represented in arrest statistics

Arson has closest ratio of arrests for African-American and white.

Race and Delinquency

African-American juveniles account for a disproportionate amount of all juvenile arrests for serious crimes.

White juveniles are arrested more often than are African-American Youth.

Self-reports indicate that African-American and white juveniles commit similar amounts of delinquency.

Are the data valid?

Arrest differences may be due to racial bias in criminal justice system.
Prior record increases chance of formal sanctions

Other researchers find arrest rates to be a product of offending rates

Ecological differences explain minority arrest rates

"African-American male juveniles less likely to admit involvement in serious crimes for which they have been arrested."

Social class and delinquency

Official data finds persistent relationship, particularly for serious offenses

Elliott and Ageton

lower-class youth are more likely to commit serious offenses

Tittle

the relationship depends on when and how the research was conducted (1940s)

Self-reports and Social Class

find insignificant relationships between class and delinquency

self-reports criticized for including measures of trivial offenses and status offenses

recent studies find lower-class youths more frequently commit serious crimes

the definition of social class often influences the results of the studies

Aging-out

aging out, desistance or spontaneous remission

explain why people stop not start committing crimes

age of onset may be a predictive variable

use of longitudinal studies

Why do people age out of crime?

changing lifestyles may reduce criminality
social commitments, personality changes, increased self-control, and increased fear of punishment
as testosterone levels decrease, so does male aggressiveness

Chronic offenders

Small numbers of youths have earlier onset and persistence in criminal behavior

Known as high rate persisters or chronic offenders

Glueck research

research on the life cycle of delinquent careers

early onset of delinquency as a harbinger of a criminal career

social factors related to persistent offending

physical and mental factors determine behavior

Delinquency in a birth cohort

Wolfgang, Figlio and Sellin

9,945 boys born in Philadelphia in 1945

one-third of boys had police contact

one-half more than one police contact

race most significant predictor of police contact

school-related variables associated with delinquency

Chronic offenders

6% of total sample

five or more police contacts

arrested earlier ages

serious violent crimes

51.9% of all reported offenses

more than 60% of all robberies, forcible rapes, aggravated assaults, and homicides

seriousness of original offense and severity of disposition related to recidivism

Birth cohort follow-up

10% of original sample followed until age 30

chronic offenders persisted into adulthood and engaged in the most serious crimes

desistance was common in the entire sample

crime seriousness escalated in adulthood

Tracy’s cohort

27,160 boys and girls born in Philadelphia in 1958

proportion of delinquents increased

overall offending patterns remained similar

racial differences less significant

white chronics increased, minority chronics decreased

violent crime ratio declined

males were two and half more likely to be delinquent than females

7% of delinquent females were chronics

7.5% of males were chronics

Columbus cohort studies

roughly two percent of juveniles arrested were chronic offenders

juveniles with five or more arrests accounted for two-thirds of al reported delinquencies

few violent juvenile offenders are repeat violent offenders

Turning points in crime

crucial points are marriage and career

build social relationships known as social capital

social capital reduces the likelihood of deviance

Conclusions

small number of youth commit majority of serious juvenile crime
boys are more involved in delinquency
delinquency decreases with age
lower-class minority males commit the majority of serious violent offenses
official intervention increases likelihood of future criminality