Prejudice

Prejudice and Discrimination

Historically, attempts to explain prejudice and discrimination have come from poets, philosophers, and historians.

Current attempts to understand prejudice in social psychology have involved the social, interpersonal, and cognitive roots of prejudice.

Prejudice and Social Cognition

Prejudice is defined as negative attitudes toward the members of specific social groups.

A prejudicial attitude is linked with evaluation.

Prejudice may be a blanket condemnation or rejection.

"Dogs drool, cats rule."

Sexism is prejudice that is based on gender.

Prejudice is at least partially an outcome of using mental shortcuts in evaluating people because of limited processing capacity, or social cognition.

A schema is a type of mental organizational framework.

John believes that women are bad at math tasks. He tends to notice when a woman fails at a math-oriented task, but rarely notices success. He is also good at bringing the failures to mind. He is using a prejudicial schema.

Attitudes consists of feelings, beliefs, and behavior.

The affective component of prejudice involves the negative emotions of prejudiced people in the presence of disliked groups.

Most people tend to focus on the affective component of prejudice.

Discrimination

Prejudice is associated with attitudes, while discrimination is associated with behavior.

Negative actions directed toward members of a social group.

Discrimination is best described as actions resulting from prejudicial beliefs, from avoidance to exclusion, to aggression.

You may have discrimination without prejudice or vice-versa.

Excessively praising a minimal accomplishment is a subtle form of prejudice.

Tokenism

Tokenism is allowing members of a specific group to participate in an activity or event solely to satisfy requirements of diversity.

Chacko found that women who believed that they had been hired because of their gender had lower job satisfaction.

Others found that persons hired for these reasons receive lower performance ratings from others. Because others tend to attribute the achievements to special hiring and not to hard work. "Perhaps they aren’t capable of the job."

This is particularly damaging because it gives an excuse for bigoted people to deny prejudice.

Reverse Discrimination

Treating members of a group favorably based on their membership in the group.

Chidester found that students more favorably evaluated African-Americans than Caucasians in "get acquainted" situations.

Fajardo's  study (1985; evaluations of essays by black and white students), showed how reverse discrimination can backfire.

White teachers were asked to grade essays which were poor, moderate, or excellent. They rated the essays supposedly done by blacks as more favorable. Strongest if they were of moderate quality, with uncertainty.

One problem with reverse discrimination is that it can lead to a false sense of ability which is later shattered.

Realistic Conflict Theory

Realistic conflict says that prejudice arises from competition for scarce resources.

Studies suggest that persistent competition leads to negative portrayals of competitors.

Hoviland and Sears showed a correlation between lynching of blacks and negative economic conditions, demonstrating group conflict.

Us-versus-them Effect

Social categorization is the process of dividing the world into distinct groups, ingroups, and outgroups. This is demonstrated often.

Race, religion, occupation, and income level are examples of social categories.

The ingroup is viewed in positive terms while the outgroup is viewed in negative terms. This is the ultimate attribution error.

We are more likely to take account of external circumstances for members of the ingroup.

One reason is that people enhance their self-esteem by identifying with particular groups, and one can view one's own group as superior.

To avoid becoming prejudiced through social categorization, belong to as many different types of groups as possible.

Social Learning Theory

Children learn prejudice from parents and peers and continue to express prejudice because they are directly rewarded for doing so.

Social norms are rules that suggest what actions are not appropriate in a given group.

Influences upon social learning include parents, friends, mass media.

Ex., Alice is washing the dishes and asks her brother to help by drying up. Her brother Bobby says that dishes are women's work, which makes their father smile. Bobby sees the smile and walks away.

Stereotypes

A stereotype is a cognitive framework consisting of knowledge about specific social groups. It is a type of a schema.

Fosters prejudice because information that is inconsistent with the stereotype is harder to retain.

Information relevant to a stereotype is processed more quickly than information unrelated to it.

Stereotype becomes self-confirming.

Illusory Correlation

The tendency to perceive a relationship between two variables where none exists.

If 10% of Group A (200 members) are found to be criminals, and 10% of Group B (10,000 members), evidence suggests that you will form less favorable impressions of Group A.

African-Americans and crime are linked (with a higher than actual correlation) because being African-American and committing crimes are both relatively infrequent events.

Note that in the U. S. minorities do commit higher proportions of violent crimes than predicted on the basis of these numbers.

Illusionary correlations leads to an assumption that it is even higher. Also, this ignores the many other factors present (poverty, growing up in a violent environment).

To circumvent, promote thorough and extensive processing of social information and paying attention to group size.

Affective States and  Illusory Correlation

Affective states affect the extent to which people make illusory correlation.

Videos of positive (funny), negative (child abuse) and neutral (volcano) create affective states.

Two social groups, A and B. Both have 2 good to 1 bad behaviors, but there are twice as many sentences written about A.

Those is a neutral mood reported liking members of A more than B, and perceived stronger relationships between group membership and the frequency of desirable and undesirable behaviors.

If they are in a bad or good mood they are less likely to make illusory correlations, because they have been found to interfere with ongoing cognitive activity. This is suggested by cognitive interpretation.

Ellen has just received a low grade on a test, while Sue has received a high grade. Harry got an average grade, which he expected. Harry is most likely to make an illusory correlation.

Outgroups and Ingroups

Outgroup homogeneity refers to the perception that members of a group, not your own, are relatively similar to one another.

Ingroup differentiation hypothesis is the perception that members of one's own group are much more varied than other groups.

Outgroup homogeneity perpetuate discrimination, stereotypes, and prejudice.

You see those older or younger than yourself as more similar to one another in terms of personal traits.

generation gap

People tend to be more accurate in recognizing the faces of strangers from their own group than strangers from another racial group. Stronger among whites.

You all look alike!

Parents and Prejudice

Majority of evidence suggests that prejudice is learned.

Discouraging child role models from expressing prejudicial beliefs or behaviors is one technique for reducing prejudice. The difficulty of this is that few role models believe that they are prejudiced.

Evidence shows that prejudice is harmful to prejudiced people as well as their targets, through stress from the unrealistic worries about the perceived ill intentions of the outgroup

Ex., Harris study demonstrated that boys who believed that their play partner was hyperactive enjoyed their play period less.

Contact Hypothesis

As contact between groups increases, prejudice decreases by countering the illusion of outgroup homogeneity.

Increased contact leads to increased perceptions of similarity.

Large amounts of disconfirming evidence will alter a stereotype.

Increased contact may help counter the illusion of outgroup homogeneity.

Conditions:

The interacting groups must be similar in social, economic, or task-related status.

The groups need to cooperate.

Contact is informal and individual.

Setting in which existing norms favor group equality.

The persons involved must view one another as typical of their respective groups.

Contact between groups that differ in social or task-related status may not be beneficial because communication is difficult.

"Us" Versus "Them"  in the Gaertner et al. (1989) study

Group boundaries are flexible.

Recategorization is the process of shifting group boundaries under certain situations.

Gaertner found that the most effective way to remove prejudice against other individuals is to have all the individuals work together as a team - common ingroup identity model.

When people view themselves as members of a group rather than as individuals, increased positive contacts are facilitated.

Weakening us-them boundaries leads to reduced prejudice.

Cooperative interaction increases the tendency of the two groups to perceive themselves as one entity and reduced feelings of bias toward the former outgroup.

Attribute-driven and Category-driven Processing

Category-driven processing is the tendency to think of others in terms of their group membership. Stereotyping is one example.

One way to reduce the impact of stereotypes is to encourage people to think carefully about other people (attribute-driven processing).

Chris believes that men are naturally bad at math problems.   Rewarding Chris for correctly guessing how well a sample of men will do on a math problem would decrease category-driven processing and reduce the stereotype.

Chris would have told you that women cannot do math problems, until a reward was offered for the most accurate guess at how well a sample of women would do on math problems. Chris did not make use of the stereotype because there was a reason to think carefully about the individual women.

Outcome-biased inferences are inferences about characteristics that are based on the result of an action, rather than the action. They may lead to a lessening of stereotypes if the action outcomes run counter to a prevailing stereotype.

Affirmative programs may decrease stereotypes about disadvantaged groups because they improve the action outcomes for that group.

A change in the outcomes actually experienced by the stereotyped groups may serve to undermine the stereotypes and weaken prejudice.

Affirmative Action Programs and Stereotypes

Affirmative action programs may not weaken stereotypes.

Publicity may call people’s attention to the possibility that different criteria are applied for different groups.

Therefore, the positive outcomes are not a consequence of the groups and this effect is reduced.

Sexism

In many cultures, the traits of decisiveness, confidence and ambition are seen as most representative of males,

While females and males are both viewed in terms of positive and negative traits, females are generally viewed more negatively than males.

Males are more aggressive and the two sexes use different techniques for influencing others.

Stereotypes vastly overstate the number and size of male-female differences.

Viewing women in terms of expected traits is harmful to them because traits assigned to women are often incompatible with traits thought necessary in valued jobs.

Women are most often harmed in job applications because they are not viewed as having leadership traits.

Van Vianen and Willemsen studied job candidates.

Successful female job candidates tended to be rated as having traits viewed as masculine.

The masculine-feminine dimension is a more important factor for job interviewers when the candidate is female.

Women and Jobs

In many countries, legal discrimination against women has been replaced by subtle discrimination.

Women are "handicapped" in job situations by having lower career expectations.

Women tend to express lower self-confidence.

Research on attributions of achievement about male and female job success indicates that success by females is often viewed as luck.

Leadership by females is often viewed with negative affect because it contradicts popular gender stereotypes and is unexpected.

The women leaders received more negative nonverbal cues from other members of the group, such as contrasting facial reactions to identical actions by female and male leaders.