Social Beliefs and Judgements
The process of using information to understand others
and the social world is called social cognition, which is composed of the cognitive
process by which we attempt to understand others and the social world. One issue addressed
by social cognition is how self-esteem predicts self-judgment. Thinking of alternative
scenarios during unpleasant events is a feature of social cognition. A primary reason that
people spend time thinking about other people is because they have to make judgments about
other people. In making judgments about others, cognition is closely linked to
affect.
Heuristics
 | Heuristics are mental processes in social cognition
that act as shortcuts to decision making by saving cognitive effort. |
 | They are decision-making rules that save mental effort. |
 | They are used in social cognition because they save
cognitive effort in processing. |
 | They are useful as a balance between early decision making
and cognitive processing. |
Representatives Heuristic
 | When we make attributions about individuals based on their
similarity to members of a particular group, we are using the representatives heuristic. |
 | It is used by people to make decisions about others based
on their similarity to members of a particular group. |
 | Most heuristics are more often accurate than not. |
 | Although often accurate, the representatives heuristic can
lead to overlooking base rate information. |
 | The representatives heuristic can lead us to make
inaccurate judgements because when using it, we rely primarily on a stereotype. |
Availability Heuristic
 | The availability heuristic bases a decision on how easily
an example of something is brought to mind. |
 | The reason that most people think that there are more
English words beginning with "k" than have "k" as the third letter is
because it is easier to think of words that have "k" as the first letter. |
 | The availability heuristic addresses the ease with which
something is brought to mind. |
 | Support for the availability heuristic was found when
people felt more assertive when they could easily remember a few times when they had been
assertive. |
False Consensus Effect
 | The false consensus effect suggests that people
overestimate the proportion of people who agree with them on a given topic. |
 | An explanation is that the belief that others are like us
protects our self-esteem. It is explained by the availability heuristic because the
opinions of our friends are both more like ours and easier to bring to mind than the
average opinion. |
 | It is least likely to apply to highly desirable attitudes,
when people may be motivated to stand out from the crowd in some positive way. Of course,
Im not like everyone else. |
Priming and Automatic Priming
 | The priming effect is an external procedure that
increases the probability that a particular category of information will be available in
memory.
 | Ex. Mike walks to school every day early in the morning.
One day, he reads about the high rate of mugging in his neighborhood. For the next week
Mike takes the bus. Mike's perceptions of the danger of walking have been influenced by
the availability heuristic which has been influenced by priming. |
 | Ex. After watching a scary movie, many people react
strongly to stimuli that would previously have had little impact upon them. (Whats
that dark shape? Whats that creaking noise?) |
|
 | Automatic priming unconsciously processes influences
on the availability of particular categories of information. |
 | Spontaneous trait inference occurs when we receive
information about others and tend to form immediate impressions about their underlying
characteristics. Spontaneously generated trait inferences influence future perception
through priming. |
 | Self-generated priming is evidenced by the finding
that people will be influenced in their perceptions of another by a list of trait
descriptions previously available to them. |
 | Priming influences decision-making heuristics. |
 | Biases in cognition are maintained because they reduce the
amount of cognitive effort used to make judgements about others. |
Consistent Versus Inconsistent Information
 | Information is more likely to grab our attention if it is
inconsistent with our viewpoint.
 | "Madonna says that she would retire and devote her
time to charities." |
 | "Newt Gingrich says he has lost interest in politics
and is going to grow roses instead." |
 | Television news reporters are too liberal/conservative. |
|
 | The tendency to pay more attention to unexpected
information can bias recall by making such instances more available in memory. This
unexpected information influences the availability heuristic. |
 | The comparative ease of recall of unexpected information
can influence perceptions of the base rate.
 | Ex. Plane crashes recalled could influence the perception
of the base rate of plane crashes. |
|
Automatic Vigilance Effect
 | Automatic vigilance refers to the tendency to notice
negative information about people such as a frown, or someone who has just been in an
argument with someone. |
 | The face-in-the-crowd effect refers to the ability to pick
out negative expressions from a crowd and is a feature of automatic vigilance. |
 | An adaptive reason for noticing negative expressions more
easily than others is that negative expressions are more likely to imply danger. |
Counterfactual Thinking
 | Counterfactual thinking is a form of mental simulation. |
 | Someone who rarely acts in a way that could allow that
outcome to occur is most likely to feel a stronger emotion over a negative outcome. |
 | Thinking about the results of an action and alternative
actions and outcomes is called counterfactual thinking. |
 | Acceding to the rules of mental simulation, a negative
outcome will lead to more feelings of regret if it is the result of a rarely performed
action because it is easier to imagine alternatives to a rarely performed action and if is
easier to engage in counterfactual thinking with a rarely performed action. |
 | The ease of engaging in counterfactual thinking to
negative outcomes that follow unusual behavior suggests that such outcomes will generate
more sympathy. |
 | Sympathy over negative outcomes is positively related to
ease of counterfactual thinking, if he or she was doing something unusual at the time. |
 | This ease of counterfactual thinking is a function of how
easily alternative outcomes can be brought to mind, associating counterfactual thinking
with the availability heuristic.
 | Ex. If your roommate always prepares for his test and this
one time faces an emergency situation, you will have more sympathy for a poor test grade.
If your roommate always goofs off, you will not have much sympathy for him. |
|
|